Free resource
Appeal letter templates that fit on a reviewer's screen
Meta's reviewers do not read essays. They check three things in the first lines: the policy area, the counter-claim, and the evidence attached. These are the statements we use on real cases, stripped of anything a reviewer cannot verify. Copy, fill the brackets, attach what each one names, and submit once through the official channel.
Last reviewed: 2026-09-15 · Official channels for each are listed in the resource hub.
Before any appeal: the eight-point check
- Screenshot the notice, the date and the exact wording before touching anything.
- Identify the policy area from the wording; it decides the channel.
- Rule out a takeover: search the attached email for security notices about changed details.
- Fix the cause first where one exists (landing page, unknown admin, unlicensed music), and keep dated evidence.
- Choose one channel, submit once, wait for the outcome.
- Add new evidence before using the next channel; never resend the same text.
- Keep a log: channel, date, reference number, attachments.
- Ignore every unsolicited offer of help. Recovery has official doors; everyone else sells a picture of one.
1. Disabled account, wrongful decision
Account: @handle, created [year], disabled on [date]. Notice: "[exact wording from the disable screen]". The decision is wrong because: [one sentence, e.g. this is my original account, active since 2016; the account impersonating me is @copy, reported on [date], reference attached]. Identity: government ID attached in the name [legal name]. The account uses my professional name [name]; the connection is documented in the attached [business registration / trademark / press]. No security changes were made to the account before the disable (checked). Requesting review.
2. Hacked account, contact details changed
Account: @handle. Taken over on [date, time if known]. Changes made by the attacker: email changed to [unknown] on [date]; phone changed on [date]; password changed on [date]; two-factor enabled on a device that is not mine. Original contact details: [email], [phone]. Recovery steps completed: security email links [used on date / expired], hacked-account flow started on [date], email account secured on [date]. Content posted by the attacker since [date]: [scam stories / crypto posts], screenshots attached. Requesting identity-based recovery. Government ID and the original security notices from Meta attached.
3. Business Manager or ad account restriction
Business: [legal name], Business Manager ID [id], verified on [date]. Restricted asset: [ad account id / page], restricted on [date] for "[stated reason]". Cause identified: [specific trigger, e.g. a login by our new media buyer from Lisbon on [date] / a client landing page edited on [date] to add an unsubstantiated claim]. Actions taken: [two-factor enforced for all admins on [date]; unknown role removed; landing page corrected on [date], live at [URL]; business verification completed]. Requesting review of the restriction on [asset]. Supporting documents attached: [list].
4. Impersonation report against a fake account
I am reporting @fake for impersonating [me / my business, legal name]. My original account: @real, active since [year]. Verified identity: government ID attached [or business registration / trademark number]. The fake account uses [my name / my logo / my photos from posts dated [dates]] and [messages my contacts asking for money / sells under my brand name]. Victims or evidence: screenshots attached with dates. Requesting removal of the impersonating account.
5. Copyright takedown, per post
Rights holder: [name / company], contact [email]. Original work: [description], first published on [date] at [URL of the original post or portfolio page]. Infringing content: [exact URL of the post or reel]. The content reproduces my original work in full / in substantial part. I have not authorised this use. I state under penalty of perjury that I am the owner of the rights described, and that this notice is accurate. Signed: [full name], [date].
Questions people ask before pasting
Does Meta read appeal letters?
Reviewers read short, specific statements attached to the official forms. They do not read essays, and automated triage rejects submissions that add no new information. Every template on this page is built to fit on one screen and to name the policy area, the counter-claim and the evidence.
Where do I paste the appeal text?
Into the free-text field of the official channel that fits the case: the in-app appeal at login, the Help Center disabled-account forms, Account Quality for advertisers, or the impersonation and intellectual property forms. Never into a DM, an email to a stranger, or a page reached from a message.
Should I attach my ID with every appeal?
Attach a government ID only inside Meta's own flows when they ask for it. Most disable and takeover reviews need identity; most content removal reports do not. Never send your ID to a service or person who offers to file for you.
Can I use these templates for Facebook?
Yes. The disable, takeover and Business Manager templates apply to Facebook profiles, Pages and ad accounts with the platform name changed. The channels differ slightly; the resource hub lists each.
If the case has already been rejected once
A template is not new evidence. If a first appeal came back rejected, the next submission has to contain something the review could not see: an identity bridge, ownership records, a report reference, proof that the cause was fixed. Our final decision guideexplains what still counts, and a free case review tells you honestly whether there is a path.
Want the appeal written for your case, not from a template?
Every case starts with a free review. We diagnose the exact flag, prepare the evidence a reviewer can verify in one pass, and file through the official channel in the right order. No hacks, no insider contacts, no guaranteed outcomes.