Free case review
Send us the post links and screenshots. We tell you honestly whether the content breaks one of X’s rules, may be unlawful where you live, or is lawful speech that no legitimate route will remove.
X (Twitter)
Posts on X that expose your home address, phone number, identity documents or other private information break X's private information policy and can be removed through X's report flow. Accusations and rumours are a different matter: X's policy says they are not private information, so a smear post usually comes down only if it breaks another rule, such as targeted harassment, impersonation or non-consensual media, or through a legal request when it is unlawful where you live, in which case X can withhold it in that country. We identify the route your case fits, prepare the report or the file for your lawyer, and submit through X's official channels. We have no contacts inside X, we do not guarantee removals, and we never target honest criticism or journalism.
Sound familiar?
The process
Send us the post links and screenshots. We tell you honestly whether the content breaks one of X’s rules, may be unlawful where you live, or is lawful speech that no legitimate route will remove.
Private information, non-consensual media, impersonation and abuse each have their own report route under X’s rules. Content that breaks none of them but is unlawful, for example defamatory statements, goes through X’s legal request process instead, after the rules route has been tried.
We prepare first-person reports with the context X’s reviewers need: proof that the information is private and that you have not published it elsewhere, proof of identity for impersonation, and dated links for a coordinated campaign.
A legal request names the specific posts and the local law they break. Where a legal demand is needed, we prepare the file for your own lawyer to send. If X accepts it, the content is usually withheld in the country where it is unlawful rather than deleted everywhere, and we explain that before anything is filed.
We track the outcome and use the appeal routes that exist when a report is wrongly rejected. Where the same personal details also show up in Google results, Google’s own removal tools for personal information can apply.
Before we start
Straight answer
Doxxing, non-consensual intimate media and impersonation have clear official routes on X and come down reliably on accepted cases. Accusations and opinions are harder: X’s private information policy does not cover rumours or allegations, and a legal request depends on the law where you live and usually limits the content in that country only. We decline cases that target criticism, reviews or reporting, and nobody outside X can force a removal.
We cannot delete anything ourselves, and nobody outside X can. We identify which X rule or which law the post breaks, prepare the strongest report or legal request for that route, and file it through X’s official channels. We tell you in the free review if no route exists.
Not under its private information policy, which lists gossip, rumours, accusations and allegations as information it does not consider private. Such posts can come down when they break another rule, for example targeted harassment or impersonation, or through a legal request if they are unlawful where you live.
Anyone can report private information shared in a clearly abusive way. Otherwise X may need to hear from the person the information belongs to, or an authorised representative such as a lawyer. Photos or videos of private individuals need a report from the person shown or their representative.
Not always, and not straight away. Search results can lag behind, and copies can exist elsewhere. Google has separate tools for removing certain personal information, such as contact details and ID numbers, from its results.
Never. We do not ask for passwords or login codes, and we do not access accounts. Anyone offering to remove posts through contacts inside X, or by mass reporting, is a warning sign.
Go deeper
Send us what happened and hear back within 5 business days. If the ban looks deserved, we decline and say why. If there is a real path through Meta’s official channels, we map it for you.
Cannot wait 5 days? Priority chat, first reply within 6 hours, US$2.99