YouTube
A terminated YouTube channel can be restored when the decision was wrong: a mistaken spam or deceptive-practices flag, a channel removed for a link to an account its owner does not control, copyright strikes from false or abusive claims, or a hacked channel that was used to stream scams. The path runs through YouTube's own appeal process for strikes and terminations, and through counter-notifications or a retraction from the claimant for copyright strikes. We diagnose why the channel was removed, rebuild the evidence and file it through the right channel. We have no contacts inside YouTube or Google, we do not guarantee outcomes, and we decline cases where the violation appears genuine.
Sound familiar?
The process
You send us the termination or strike email and the channel link. We tell you honestly whether the decision looks wrong, which policy it was made under, and whether there is still a route. If the violation looks genuine, we say so and decline.
Termination emails name a policy, not a reason. We reconstruct the likely trigger from the strike history, recent uploads, metadata, linked accounts, channel permissions and any signs of a takeover, because the appeal has to answer the real trigger.
One clear, factual appeal through YouTube’s official form, with the evidence a reviewer needs: proof of ownership and original content, licences, the dates of a compromise and what was secured afterwards. Duplicate or emotional appeals tend to hurt a case, so we file one prepared submission.
For copyright strikes, the official routes are a counter-notification, which is a legal statement with real consequences, or a retraction request to the claimant. We prepare the file and explain the trade-offs before anything is sent, and we tell you when a claim is valid and a counter-notification would be a mistake.
Whatever the result, we leave the channel safer: two-step verification on the Google account, cleaned-up channel permissions and managers, and a clear list of what not to do while a review is open, including never creating a replacement channel.
Before we start
Straight answer
Hacked channels that were used to stream scams and mistaken spam or linked-channel terminations have the strongest paths, because the evidence can show the decision was wrong. False copyright strikes can be resolved through counter-notification when the claim does not hold up. Channels terminated for genuine repeated violations, or for creating new channels after a termination, usually have no path left, and we say so in the free review. The final decision always belongs to YouTube, and nobody outside Google can overrule it.
Sometimes, when the termination was a mistake and the evidence can show it. We cannot reverse a decision ourselves and nobody outside Google can. What we do is prepare and file the strongest possible case through YouTube’s official appeal process, and tell you honestly in the free review whether that case exists.
No. YouTube’s rules prohibit using, owning or creating other channels after a termination, and a replacement channel is usually terminated too. It can also weaken the appeal for the original channel. Keep your audience informed through other platforms until the review ends.
Secure the Google account first: recover it through Google’s account recovery, change the password, turn on two-step verification and remove unknown devices and channel managers. Then appeal the termination with the dates of the compromise and what you changed. A reviewer needs to see that the activity was not yours and that it has stopped.
YouTube does not publish a fixed turnaround. Strike appeals are often answered within days, and termination appeals can take longer. Copyright counter-notifications follow a legal waiting period before content can be reinstated. In the free review we give you a realistic range for your case type.
Never. We do not ask for passwords, two-step codes or channel access. Anyone who does, or who claims inside contacts at YouTube or guaranteed reinstatement, is a warning sign.
Send us what happened and hear back within 5 business days. If the ban looks deserved, we decline and say why. If there is a real path through Meta’s official channels, we map it for you.
Cannot wait 5 days? Priority chat, first reply within 6 hours, US$2.99