Confidential free review
You tell us what is out there and how it got there. We map each piece of content to the policy it violates and tell you honestly what is removable and what is not. Everything you share stays between us.
Reputation
Content about you that was posted without your permission, videos of you, private photos, fake profiles using your face, your images in scam ads, can usually be removed through Meta's official reporting channels. The craft is knowing which policy applies: privacy violation, impersonation, harassment, intimate image abuse or intellectual property, because each has its own form, its own evidence and its own review team. We map your case to the right channel and manage the filings until the content is down. One firm line: we remove violations, never honest criticism.
Sound familiar?
The process
You tell us what is out there and how it got there. We map each piece of content to the policy it violates and tell you honestly what is removable and what is not. Everything you share stays between us.
Links, screenshots with timestamps, proof of your identity and, where relevant, proof you never consented. Reports fail on missing evidence far more often than on wrong policy, so this step is done properly before anything is filed.
A fake profile goes through impersonation reporting with ID. A nonconsensual video goes through privacy or intimate-image channels, which Meta treats with priority. A stolen photo goes through IP. Filing everything through one generic report button is why self-filed attempts stall.
Wrongly rejected reports get resubmitted with strengthened evidence, and repeat offenders get escalated toward account-level enforcement. You get a status you can actually follow, item by item.
Removed content sometimes resurfaces from new accounts. For a period after the case we watch for reposts and refile fast, and we show you how to report instantly if something reappears later.
Before we start
Straight answer
Content that clearly violates policy, fake profiles, nonconsensual videos, scam ads with your face, comes down reliably on accepted cases, and intimate-image abuse in particular is treated with priority by Meta's dedicated channels. What we cannot remove, and will not pretend to: news coverage, public-interest reporting and honest criticism. If what hurts you is true and lawful speech, we decline the case and tell you why instead of taking your money.
Priority categories such as intimate-image abuse and impersonation with ID often resolve within days. Ordinary privacy and harassment reports commonly take one to three weeks including escalations. We give a realistic estimate per item in the free review.
Meta does not tell them who reported. They will see the content was removed for a policy violation. For safety-sensitive situations we plan the filing order so nothing signals you before the takedown lands.
No. Journalism and honest opinion are not policy violations, and services promising to erase them are selling something that does not exist or methods that will backfire on you. We remove violations: impersonation, nonconsensual content, harassment, stolen material.
Yes. Meta participates in preventive matching programs for intimate images, and threats themselves are reportable extortion. This situation has well-established official routes, and moving early matters. Contact us and we will move the same day.
Our core work is Meta platforms. For Reddit we have a dedicated service, and for other platforms we will tell you honestly in the review whether we can run the case or point you to the right process to run yourself.
Send us what happened and hear back within 24 hours. If the ban looks deserved, we decline and say why. If there is a real path through Meta’s official channels, we map it for you.