Free case review
You tell us what happened, what the ban notice says and what you have already tried. We tell you honestly whether an appeal has a real basis. If the violation looks genuine, we decline the case and say so.
Disabled Instagram accounts
If your Instagram account was disabled and you believe the decision was wrong, you can appeal it through Meta's official review channels. We assess why the account was flagged, prepare the evidence Meta's reviewers actually look for, and manage each appeal stage until you get a final decision. We only work through official channels and we only take cases where the ban looks unjustified.
Sound familiar?
The process
You tell us what happened, what the ban notice says and what you have already tried. We tell you honestly whether an appeal has a real basis. If the violation looks genuine, we decline the case and say so.
We identify which policy the account was flagged under, because the appeal route and the evidence differ for copyright, impersonation, fraud and safety flags. Appealing under the wrong frame is the most common reason self-appeals fail.
We prepare the identity documents, ownership proof and written statement in the structure Meta reviewers expect: factual, specific and tied to the exact policy in question.
We guide the submission through the correct official channel for your case type, in the right order. Some routes close if others are used first, so sequencing matters.
Meta reviews are slow and often need escalation to the next official stage. We track deadlines, respond to reviewer requests and keep you informed until there is a final decision.
Before we start
Straight answer
Most accepted cases of this type end with the account restored, and we publish anonymized examples in our case studies. But no honest consultant can promise an outcome, because the final decision is always Meta's. We quote our track record only for accepted cases, by case type, and we accept a case only when we see a real basis for appeal.
Proof
No, and we do not try to. We decline cases where the violation appears to have actually happened. We accept cases where the ban looks wrongful: false copyright claims, mistaken impersonation flags, wrongful fraud or safety accusations and similar errors.
Typically anywhere from a few days to several weeks, depending on the flag type and how many review stages are needed. Copyright disputes tend to resolve faster than safety related flags. We give you a realistic estimate after the free review.
Never. We work exclusively through the appeal and review channels Meta provides. Anyone promising insider access or guaranteed recovery in 24 hours is describing something that is either a scam or a serious violation. That is exactly the industry problem we position against.
Usually not. An automated rejection of a self-filed appeal is often the starting point, not the end. Many case types have further official review stages, and a properly framed resubmission with the right evidence can succeed where the first attempt failed.
The case review is free. If we accept the case we quote a fixed fee before any work starts, based on the case type and stages involved. You will never get a surprise invoice, and we explain the fee logic on our How We Work page.
Go deeper
Send us what happened and hear back within 24 hours. If the ban looks deserved, we decline and say why. If there is a real path through Meta’s official channels, we map it for you.